Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Craig Newell Welding, Inc.

Cambridge Springs, PA · ~27 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Craig Newell Welding, Inc. runs at 152% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Craig Newell Welding, Inc.: 5.0 TCR = 152% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Craig Newell Welding, Inc. safety composite

Craig Newell Welding, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2023

Craig Newell Welding, Inc. injury rate improved

Craig Newell Welding, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.2 from 4.2 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=7.7 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Cambridge Springs, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 152% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #35/68
  • PHOTO Korda Mfg.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Korda Mfg. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Craig Newell Welding, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Craig Newell Welding, Inc. averages 5.0 TCR (152% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Craig Newell Welding, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=7.7 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=3 · BLS 3.3

Where Craig Newell Welding, Inc. falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 68 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in Pennsylvania.

Craig Newell Welding, Inc. (27 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Craig Newell Welding, Inc.
Craig Newell Welding, Inc. (27 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Craig Newell Welding, Inc. has fewer employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2022 6.9 0.0 2 0 0
2020 7.7 3.9 2 0 0
2019 4.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2017 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2016 4.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · PA · Cambridge Springs

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 4 employers in Cambridge Springs, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Korda Mfg. 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 857 American Construction Metals 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Protolabs - Rapid 104 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Standard Technologies 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Feeney's Wholesale Nursery 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hunterstown Power Generation 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Panda Liberty 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE LMBE Project Company LLC 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR LORD Corporation - Cambridge Springs 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meadville Forging Company - Cambridge Springs CNC 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Campbell Studios Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-TCR Duratech Industries International Inc 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Us Autoforce Des Moines 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mid-States Aluminum 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kaiser Air Conditioning & Sheet Metal 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hawley Street Shop (Location) 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Novus Wood Group - Houston 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mallard Creek Polymers LLC - Research 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ziron Environmental Services, Inc. 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.