Precision turned product manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Meadville Forging Company - Cambridge Springs CNC

Cambridge Springs, PA · ~69 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Meadville Forging Company - Cambridge Springs CNC runs at 121% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Precision turned product manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Meadville Forging Company - Cambridge Springs CNC: 4.0 TCR = 121% of Precision turned product manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Meadville Forging Company - Cambridge Springs CNC safety composite

Meadville Forging Company - Cambridge Springs CNC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Meadville Forging Company - Cambridge Springs CNC held a steady TCR band

Meadville Forging Company - Cambridge Springs CNC's TCR held near 0.1 from 5.1 in 2016 to 5.2 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.1 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=4.1 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332721 · Cambridge Springs, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 121% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #15/33
  • PHOTO Decker Precision Mac…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Decker Precision Machining, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Meadville Forging Company - Cambridge Springs CNC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Meadville Forging Company - Cambridge Springs CNC averages 4.0 TCR (121% of the Precision turned product manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Meadville Forging Company - Cambridge Springs CNC TCR series: 2016=5.1 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=4.1 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=5.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Meadville Forging Company - Cambridge Springs CNC falls in its industry

464 Precision turned product manuf establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 33 Precision turned product manuf employers in Pennsylvania.

Meadville Forging Company - Cambridge Springs CNC (69 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Meadville Forging Company - Cambridge Springs CNC
Meadville Forging Company - Cambridge Springs CNC (69 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Meadville Forging Company - Cambridge Springs CNC has more employees than the Precision turned product manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2022 3.5 1.7 1 1 0
2020 4.1 2.1 2 0 0
2019 2.1 0.0 0 2 0
2016 5.1 1.3 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332721 · PA · Cambridge Springs

464 Precision turned product manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 4 employers in Cambridge Springs, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Decker Precision Machining, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Plant 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR USA Spares Inc 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advantage Manufacturing 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Materials Division 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eddystone 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE JBC Associates, Inc. 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE HHC Winfield 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR LORD Corporation - Cambridge Springs 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR Campbell Studios Inc. 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR CRAIG NEWELL WELDING, INC. 27 FTE
NAT-TCR Ohio Valley Aluminum Co, LLC 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Westfield - BMD 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Park at Modesto 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sanderson Farms Kinston Live Haul 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE pakliteincmebane 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mattucci Plumbing 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shawnee Lodge 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cedar Shore Arrowwood 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.