Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard · Illinois

Crescent Cardboard Company

Wheeling, IL · ~97 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crescent Cardboard Company runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

Crescent Cardboard Company: 3.5 TCR = 106% of Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crescent Cardboard Company safety composite

Crescent Cardboard Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Crescent Cardboard Company: 3.9 → 4.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Crescent Cardboard Company's TCR rose 1.0 from 3.9 in 2021 to 4.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322299 · Wheeling, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 106% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/17
  • PHOTO Gusmer Enterprises, …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~97 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gusmer Enterprises, Inc. Fresno, CA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Crescent Cardboard Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crescent Cardboard Company averages 3.5 TCR (106% of the Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crescent Cardboard Company TCR series: 2021=3.9 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=4.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Crescent Cardboard Company falls in its industry

236 Die-cut paper products (except establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 17 Die-cut paper products (except employers in Illinois.

Crescent Cardboard Company (97 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Crescent Cardboard Company
Crescent Cardboard Company (97 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Crescent Cardboard Company has more employees than the Die-cut paper products (except for offic median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.9 0.0 4 0 0
2023 3.1 1.0 3 0 0
2022 2.1 1.1 2 0 0
2021 3.9 3.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322299 · IL · Wheeling

236 Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 136 employers in Wheeling, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gusmer Enterprises, Inc. Fresno, CA 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mercantile Development Inc 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR N.A.L. COMPANY, INC. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greenfiber Salt Lake 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ieso LLC 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fox Metro Water Reclamation District 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE pan oceanic engineering 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE M.I.V 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR IL-01 4,581 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wheeling School District 21 967 FTE
CITY-NEAR Main Office - 01 800 FTE
CITY-NEAR Response Team 1 728 FTE
NAT-TCR Faithway Alliance - Guntersville, AL 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Interstate Drywall Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1708 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 3335 - San Marcos Downtown 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Northern Montana Care Center 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kirby Ohio 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE SEPCO 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE CL&D Graphics LLC 97 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.