Paper products (except office supply), die-cut, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Connecticut

Mercantile Development Inc

Shelton, CT · ~46 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mercantile Development Inc runs at 107% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Paper products (except office supply), die-cut, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

Mercantile Development Inc: 3.5 TCR = 107% of Paper products (except office supply), die-cut, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mercantile Development Inc safety composite

Mercantile Development Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2017→2024

Mercantile Development Inc injury rate improved

Mercantile Development Inc's TCR fell 2.0 from 4.3 in 2017 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.3 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=5.0 · 2023=6.0 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322299 · Shelton, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 107% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK P44
  • PHOTO N.A.L. COMPANY, INC.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: N.A.L. COMPANY, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Mercantile Development Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mercantile Development Inc averages 3.5 TCR (107% of the Paper products (except office supply), die-cut, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mercantile Development Inc TCR series: 2017=4.3 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=5 · 2023=6 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Mercantile Development Inc falls in its industry

236 Paper products (except office establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Mercantile Development Inc (46 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mercantile Development Inc
Mercantile Development Inc (46 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Mercantile Development Inc has fewer employees than the Paper products (except office supply), d median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2023 6.0 2.0 3 0 0
2022 5.0 2.5 2 0 0
2021 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2020 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2019 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2017 4.3 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322299 · CT · Shelton

236 Paper products (except office supply), die-cut, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 111 employers in Shelton, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR N.A.L. COMPANY, INC. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gusmer Enterprises, Inc. Fresno, CA 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crescent Cardboard Company 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seaman Paper Company of Orange, Massachusetts 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Haynes Materials 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRG Middletown Power LLC 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Viking Construction, Inc. 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Network Interiors, Inc. 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR AffinEco, LLC 1,740 FTE
CITY-NEAR SMG 1,487 FTE
CITY-NEAR SSC, Inc. 820 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US CT Shelton Far Mill Crossng (5223) 655 FTE
NAT-TCR Boot Hill Casino & Resort 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR ABC Roofing A Tecta America Company 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Phillips Gourmet INC 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ocala 10290 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE RCUH/Core Staff 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vya, Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charlottesville Office 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE NORWALK 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.