General warehousing and storage · Ohio

Crescent Park Corporation C-10

Cincinnati, OH · ~48 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crescent Park Corporation C-10 runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Crescent Park Corporation C-10: 1.9 TCR = 32% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crescent Park Corporation C-10 safety composite

Crescent Park Corporation C-10 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Crescent Park Corporation C-10: 0.0 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.07× in 2024

Crescent Park Corporation C-10's TCR rose 2.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.9 · 32% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #171/556
  • PHOTO Rinchem Company - CS…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rinchem Company - CSC 37 Bensalem (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Crescent Park Corporation C-10 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crescent Park Corporation C-10 averages 1.9 TCR (32% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crescent Park Corporation C-10 TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=2 · BLS 5.8

Where Crescent Park Corporation C-10 falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #171 safest of 556 General warehousing and storag employers in Ohio.

Crescent Park Corporation C-10 (48 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Crescent Park Corporation C-10
Crescent Park Corporation C-10 (48 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Crescent Park Corporation C-10 has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2023 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2021 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · OH · Cincinnati

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rinchem Company - CSC 37 Bensalem 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR KLS P&G DC CA 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lifetime Brands Winchendon 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR WM 4894 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ohio Heavy Equipment Leasing, LLC 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Butler Rural Electric Cooperative 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Dayton West 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE US Bronco Services, Inc 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR C. M. Morris Group Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR First Student Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Montell Fabrication and Rebuild LLC 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR TGC Hospitality Management, LLC/TownePlace Suites Macon Mercer 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Paradise Garden Center Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Cypress Station 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tealstone Commercial, Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Easy Blends 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.