Hospital and medical service plans, direct, without providing health care services · Georgia

Crisp EMS

Cordele, GA · ~29 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.9
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crisp EMS runs at 2386% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hospital and medical service plans, direct, without providing health care services workplace, earning a grade F.

Crisp EMS: 11.9 TCR = 2386% of Hospital and medical service plans, direct, without providing health care services BLS 0.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crisp EMS safety composite

Crisp EMS scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Crisp EMS: 9.0 → 25.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 25.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.85× in 2024

Crisp EMS's TCR rose 16.3 from 9.0 in 2020 to 25.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 524114 · Cordele, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.9 · 2386% of ind

  • DART 10.1 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Crisp Regional Nursi…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crisp Regional Nursing and Rehab (1.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Crisp EMS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crisp EMS averages 11.9 TCR (2386% of the Hospital and medical service plans, direct, without providing health care services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crisp EMS TCR series: 2020=9 · 2021=6.7 · 2022=12.1 · 2023=6.5 · 2024=25.4 · BLS 0.5

Where Crisp EMS falls in its industry

162 Hospital and medical service p establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Hospital and medical service p employers in Georgia.

Crisp EMS (29 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 360 employees and a TCR of 0.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Crisp EMS
Crisp EMS (29 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 360 employees and a TCR of 0.5

Crisp EMS has fewer employees than the Hospital and medical service plans, dire median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 25.4 10.1 5 0 0
2023 6.5 0.0 2 0 0
2022 12.1 4.0 6 0 0
2021 6.7 6.7 2 0 0
2020 9.0 5.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

524114 · GA · Cordele

162 Hospital and medical service plans, direct, without providing health care services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 49 employers in Cordele, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crisp Regional Nursing and Rehab 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cordele Health and Rehab 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Ocala 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hospital Hima San Pablo Humacao 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Valdosta TMC - 805 W. Savannah Ave. Valdosta, GA 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tifton Operating - 1010 Bruce Lane Tifton, GA 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bainbridge Operating - 308 Airport Rd. Bainbridge, GA 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crisp Regional Hospital 560 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1006 293 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marvair 290 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1006 290 FTE
NAT-TCR LA Westfork, LLC 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Champion Modular, Inc 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Clinton Hollow ICF 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bakersfield Dc 2005 11.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Star Lumber El Reno Truss 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bridgewater Farm Supply Co., Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE U Pull and Pay Denver 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hampton Inn 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.