Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Crofton Manor Inn

Long Beach, CA · ~100 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crofton Manor Inn runs at 436% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Crofton Manor Inn: 16.6 TCR = 436% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crofton Manor Inn safety composite

Crofton Manor Inn scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 28.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Crofton Manor Inn: 13.0 → 28.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 49.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.7× in 2024

Crofton Manor Inn's TCR rose 15.1 from 13.0 in 2017 to 28.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 49.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Long Beach, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 16.6 · 436% of ind

  • DART 28.1 DART
  • RANK #535/635
  • PHOTO The Canopy at Harper…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Canopy at Harper Lake (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Crofton Manor Inn in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crofton Manor Inn averages 16.6 TCR (436% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crofton Manor Inn TCR series: 2017=13 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=49.7 · 2021=11.7 · 2022=14.7 · 2023=9 · 2024=28.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Crofton Manor Inn falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #535 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Crofton Manor Inn (100 employees, TCR 16.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Crofton Manor Inn
Crofton Manor Inn (100 employees, TCR 16.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Crofton Manor Inn has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 28.1 28.1 0 19 0
2023 9.0 7.5 3 3 0
2022 14.7 14.7 5 4 0
2021 11.7 11.7 5 2 0
2020 49.7 49.7 1 31 0
2019 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2018 3.2 3.2 2 0 0
2017 13.0 13.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Long Beach

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 614 employers in Long Beach, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Canopy at Harper Lake 16.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commonwealth Senior Living at Hillsville 16.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Poway Gardens Senior Living 16.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY WALTHAM OPERATION LLC 16.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 4Seasons Farms, LLC 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bud of California Cauliflower 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Legacy Growers, LLC. 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE DE CRUZ FLC 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorialcare Long Beach Medical Center 3,755 FTE
CITY-NEAR LBM00 LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MED CENTER 3,552 FTE
CITY-NEAR Total Terminals International, LLC. 2,683 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 300 2,621 FTE
NAT-TCR Will-O-Crest Farm 16.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Robinson Glass of Tulsa 16.6 TCR
NAT-TCR BZN-GH 16.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Gardens Assisted Living 16.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Niagara Bottling, LLC - Kenosha 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milton Steel Company 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Astor Services for Children & Families- Tilden 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plaskolite New Jersey 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.