Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Sage Mountain

Thousand Oaks, CA · ~79 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sage Mountain runs at 437% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Sage Mountain: 16.6 TCR = 437% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sage Mountain safety composite

Sage Mountain scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2019→2024

Sage Mountain injury rate improved

Sage Mountain's TCR fell 2.2 from 13.7 in 2019 to 11.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 28.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=13.7 · 2020=25.1 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=28.9 · 2024=11.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Thousand Oaks, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.6 · 437% of ind

  • DART 5.8 DART
  • RANK #536/635
  • PHOTO KRE-BSL HUSKY WALTHA…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KRE-BSL HUSKY WALTHAM OPERATION LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sage Mountain in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sage Mountain averages 16.6 TCR (437% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sage Mountain TCR series: 2019=13.7 · 2020=25.1 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=28.9 · 2024=11.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Sage Mountain falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #536 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Sage Mountain (79 employees, TCR 16.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Sage Mountain
Sage Mountain (79 employees, TCR 16.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Sage Mountain has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.5 5.8 7 1 0
2022 28.9 18.7 17 0 0
2021 3.8 1.9 1 1 0
2020 25.1 25.1 7 6 0
2019 13.7 12.2 7 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Thousand Oaks

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 143 employers in Thousand Oaks, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY WALTHAM OPERATION LLC 16.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jefferson Memory Care 16.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Welcov Assisted Living at Papillion 16.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commonwealth Senior Living at Hillsville 16.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crisalida Berry Farms, LLC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE L E Cooke Co 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOBI'S 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amgen Inc. (Thousand Oaks, CA) 5,792 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amgen USA (Sales - Flex workers) 2,803 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 472 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Robles Hospital and Medical Center 1,651 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 0761 16.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 083876-Manchester Po 16.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Valor Plastics 16.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bolingreen Health and Rehabilitation 16.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Boyd Linen Uniform Service 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clear Path Recycling 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookhaven 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Homeland,FL - 208 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.