Horizontal drilling (e.g., underground cable, pipeline, sewer installation) · Kansas

Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc

Columbus, KS · ~352 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Horizontal drilling (e.g., underground cable, pipeline, sewer installation) workplace, earning a grade B.

Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc: 1.6 TCR = 59% of Horizontal drilling (e.g., underground cable, pipeline, sewer installation) BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc safety composite

Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2022

Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc injury rate improved

Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc's TCR fell 1.4 from 2.7 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.7 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.7 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Columbus, KS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 59% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Gulf and East Coast …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~352 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gulf and East Coast Dredging (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc averages 1.6 TCR (59% of the Horizontal drilling (e.g., underground cable, pipeline, sewer installation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.7 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=1.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc falls in its industry

932 Horizontal drilling (e.g., und establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Horizontal drilling (e.g., und employers in Kansas.

Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc (352 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc
Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc (352 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc has more employees than the Horizontal drilling (e.g., underground c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.2 0.7 5 0 0
2021 1.3 1.3 5 0 0
2019 1.7 1.7 7 0 0
2018 1.4 1.2 5 1 0
2016 2.7 1.5 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · KS · Columbus

932 Horizontal drilling (e.g., underground cable, pipeline, sewer installation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 12 employers in Columbus, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gulf and East Coast Dredging 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Baltimore Facility 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hydra Engineering & Construction LLC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shavers-Whittle Construction LLC. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Upfield Sourcing US Inc. - New Century 353 FTE
STATE-SIZE John Deere Coffeyville Works 353 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coffeyville Resources 350 FTE
STATE-SIZE OLATHE KS 350 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crossland Construction Company, Inc. 1,154 FTE
CITY-NEAR 329 - New Albany-OH 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL COLUMBUS 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medicalodges Columbus 60 FTE
NAT-TCR US - Branch Network : 0568 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kellenberger Plumbing & Underground, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 4765-ORDPW9646 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Scandrill Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE HP Hood - Batavia 352 FTE
NAT-SIZE Global Tissue Group 352 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5172 Bolingbrook Assembly 352 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bloomington TRIA Orthopaedic 352 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.