Commercial building construction general contractors · Kansas

Crossland Construction Company, Inc.

Columbus, KS · ~1,154 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crossland Construction Company, Inc. runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Crossland Construction Company, Inc.: 0.8 TCR = 28% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crossland Construction Company, Inc. safety composite

Crossland Construction Company, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2023

Crossland Construction Company, Inc. injury rate improved

Crossland Construction Company, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.2 from 1.5 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.5 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=1.0 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Columbus, KS AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #6/63
  • PHOTO The Weitz Company, LLC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 57 inj
  • SIZE ~1,154 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Weitz Company, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Crossland Construction Company, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crossland Construction Company, Inc. averages 0.8 TCR (28% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crossland Construction Company, Inc. TCR series: 2016=1.5 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=1 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.3 · BLS 2.9

Where Crossland Construction Company, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 63 Commercial building constructi employers in Kansas.

Crossland Construction Company, Inc. (1,154 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Crossland Construction Company, Inc.
Crossland Construction Company, Inc. (1,154 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Crossland Construction Company, Inc. has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.3 0.2 4 0 0
2022 0.6 0.5 6 0 0
2021 0.6 0.4 6 0 0
2019 1.0 0.5 12 0 0
2018 0.9 0.9 11 0 0
2016 1.5 0.7 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · KS · Columbus

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 12 employers in Columbus, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Weitz Company, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mascaro Construction Company, L.P. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CHASCO CONSTRUCTORS 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rycon Construction, Inc - Fort Lauderdale 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Creekstone Farms 1,167 FTE
STATE-SIZE Menorah medical center 1,136 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGCO Hesston 1,128 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGCO : Hesston 1,189 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc 352 FTE
CITY-NEAR 329 - New Albany-OH 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL COLUMBUS 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medicalodges Columbus 60 FTE
NAT-TCR Hillcrest Transportation, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR ResideoCA12 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Intercontinental Jet Service Corp 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Independent Home Care, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1800 Larimer-020 1,154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookings 1,154 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Ritz-Carlton Los Angeles & The JW Marriott L.A. LIVE 1,154 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Redding 1,154 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.