Galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade · Indiana

Crossroads Galvanizing

Lafayette, IN · ~91 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crossroads Galvanizing runs at 569% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Crossroads Galvanizing: 18.8 TCR = 569% of Galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crossroads Galvanizing safety composite

Crossroads Galvanizing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 35% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−42.2

2018→2024

Crossroads Galvanizing injury rate improved

Crossroads Galvanizing's TCR fell 42.2 from 47.3 in 2018 to 5.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 133.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=47.3 · 2019=133.5 · 2020=19.6 · 2021=24.8 · 2022=14.0 · 2023=2.0 · 2024=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Lafayette, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.8 · 569% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #32/32
  • PHOTO Seaver Industrial Fi…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 99 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Seaver Industrial Finishing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Crossroads Galvanizing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crossroads Galvanizing averages 18.8 TCR (569% of the Galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crossroads Galvanizing TCR series: 2018=47.3 · 2019=133.5 · 2020=19.6 · 2021=24.8 · 2022=14 · 2023=2 · 2024=5 · BLS 3.3

Where Crossroads Galvanizing falls in its industry

646 Galvanizing metals and metal p establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 32 Galvanizing metals and metal p employers in Indiana.

Crossroads Galvanizing (91 employees, TCR 18.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Crossroads Galvanizing
Crossroads Galvanizing (91 employees, TCR 18.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Crossroads Galvanizing has more employees than the Galvanizing metals and metal products fo median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 3.0 5 0 0
2023 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2022 14.0 11.8 13 0 0
2021 24.8 17.1 13 0 0
2020 19.6 15.1 13 0 1
2019 133.5 104.9 42 0 0
2018 47.3 25.8 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · IN · Lafayette

646 Galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 205 employers in Lafayette, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Seaver Industrial Finishing 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR HMC Performance Coatings 18.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plas-Tech Coatings 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Newchem, Inc. (dba Newcut) 18.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE WVPA Headquarters 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Niblock Excavating & Asphalt Inc 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Roofing-Sheet Metal 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE For Bare Feet, LLC 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Subaru of Indiana Automotive, Inc. 6,222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lafayette Operations 3,025 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wabash Lafayette North 2,452 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arnett Hospital 2,070 FTE
NAT-TCR Summerfield Senior Living 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Molly Maid of Greater Clear Lake 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0124 Burbank 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Burlington Vt - 036 18.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE HC Sparks 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riker Products Inc 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE 62FE 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE JG Alexander Nursing Center 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.