Powder coating metals and metal products for the trade · Michigan

Seaver Industrial Finishing

Grand Haven, MI · ~32 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Seaver Industrial Finishing runs at 568% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Powder coating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Seaver Industrial Finishing: 18.8 TCR = 568% of Powder coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Seaver Industrial Finishing safety composite

Seaver Industrial Finishing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 18.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2024

Seaver Industrial Finishing injury rate improved

Seaver Industrial Finishing's TCR fell 3.4 from 22.3 in 2016 to 18.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 37.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=22.3 · 2018=13.3 · 2019=37.8 · 2020=27.1 · 2021=22.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=8.5 · 2024=18.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Grand Haven, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.8 · 568% of ind

  • DART 18.9 DART
  • RANK #46/47
  • PHOTO Crossroads Galvanizing
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crossroads Galvanizing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Seaver Industrial Finishing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Seaver Industrial Finishing averages 18.8 TCR (568% of the Powder coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Seaver Industrial Finishing TCR series: 2016=22.3 · 2018=13.3 · 2019=37.8 · 2020=27.1 · 2021=22.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=8.5 · 2024=18.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Seaver Industrial Finishing falls in its industry

646 Powder coating metals and meta establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 47 Powder coating metals and meta employers in Michigan.

Seaver Industrial Finishing (32 employees, TCR 18.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Seaver Industrial Finishing
Seaver Industrial Finishing (32 employees, TCR 18.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Seaver Industrial Finishing has fewer employees than the Powder coating metals and metal products median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 18.9 18.9 5 0 0
2023 8.5 8.5 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 22.2 22.2 6 0 0
2020 27.1 24.4 10 0 0
2019 37.8 37.8 9 2 0
2018 13.3 13.3 4 0 0
2016 22.3 15.9 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · MI · Grand Haven

646 Powder coating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 81 employers in Grand Haven, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crossroads Galvanizing 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR HMC Performance Coatings 18.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plas-Tech Coatings 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Newchem, Inc. (dba Newcut) 18.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6801_15743 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Black Soil Dairy 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berrybrook 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Tawas 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Haven Area Public Schools 971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shape Corp - 14600 172nd Ave. 592 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Ottawa Community Hospital 450 FTE
CITY-NEAR TH Grand Haven Hospital-MH-MI 409 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0610 Clifton 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Falls Run Nursing & Rehab. 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Corning Sow Farm 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0038 Redondo Bch 18.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cape Canaveral Air Force Station 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Melto Metal Products Company, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cotterman Company - Texas Division 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winebow-CT 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.