Nursing homes · Alabama

Crossville Health & Rehabilitation, LLC

Crossville, AL · ~158 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
28.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crossville Health & Rehabilitation, LLC runs at 432% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade F.

Crossville Health & Rehabilitation, LLC: 28.1 TCR = 432% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crossville Health & Rehabilitation, LLC safety composite

Crossville Health & Rehabilitation, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 28.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−33.0

2020→2021

Crossville Health & Rehabilitation, LLC injury rate improved

Crossville Health & Rehabilitation, LLC's TCR fell 33.0 from 44.5 in 2020 to 11.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 44.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=44.5 · 2021=11.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Crossville, AL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 28.1 · 432% of ind

  • DART 11.6 DART
  • RANK #268/269
  • PHOTO Continuing Healthcar…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~158 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Continuing Healthcare at Sterling Suites (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Crossville Health & Rehabilitation, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crossville Health & Rehabilitation, LLC averages 28.1 TCR (432% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crossville Health & Rehabilitation, LLC TCR series: 2020=44.5 · 2021=11.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Crossville Health & Rehabilitation, LLC falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #268 safest of 269 Nursing homes employers in Alabama.

Crossville Health & Rehabilitation, LLC (158 employees, TCR 28.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Crossville Health & Rehabilitation, LLC
Crossville Health & Rehabilitation, LLC (158 employees, TCR 28.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Crossville Health & Rehabilitation, LLC has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 11.6 11.6 9 6 0
2020 44.5 43.8 4 54 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · AL · Crossville

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 10 employers in Crossville, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Continuing Healthcare at Sterling Suites 28.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aperion Care Morton Villa, LLC 28.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arlington Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation 28.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Complete Care at Shorrock Gardens 28.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Prystup Packaging Products-Main 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Systems Automotive Interiors Alabama 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1531 LOWE S OF BESSEMER AL 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-0423 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crossville Health & Rehab LLC 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crossville Health and Rehabilitation, LLC 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crossville Health and Rehabilitation, L.L.C. 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Koch Foods Crossville Hatchery 61 FTE
NAT-TCR Eastern Animal Hospital 28.1 TCR
NAT-TCR MGF Logistics LLC 28.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZBUR 28.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Aperion Care Morton Villa, LLC 28.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Matthews International 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE TLOH 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodbury Healthcare Center 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Abington Reldan Metals, LLC 158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.