Closures, metal, stamping · Ohio

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Lancaster Machine

Lancaster, OH · ~30 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Lancaster Machine runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Closures, metal, stamping workplace, earning a grade C.

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Lancaster Machine: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Closures, metal, stamping BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Lancaster Machine safety composite

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Lancaster Machine scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Lancaster Machine held a steady TCR band

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Lancaster Machine's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Lancaster, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/70
  • PHOTO Johnson & Hoffman, LLC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Johnson & Hoffman, LLC (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Lancaster Machine in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Lancaster Machine averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Closures, metal, stamping BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Lancaster Machine TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Lancaster Machine falls in its industry

477 Closures, metal, stamping establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 70 Closures, metal, stamping employers in Ohio.

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Lancaster Machine (30 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Lancaster Machine
Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Lancaster Machine (30 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Lancaster Machine has fewer employees than the Closures, metal, stamping median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · OH · Lancaster

477 Closures, metal, stamping employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 96 employers in Lancaster, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Johnson & Hoffman, LLC 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 130 Belmont Drive 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MICRO B130 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR WLS Fabricating 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tuente Farms Inc 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farm 3 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Layer 6 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canton Hatchery 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairfield Medical Center 2,049 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anchor Hocking Plant 1 701 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anchor Hocking 688 FTE
CITY-NEAR Treehouse Foods, Lancaster OH 329 FTE
NAT-TCR Envision Printing, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Fremont - Community Support Includes Recreation and Human Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE R&R Provision Company 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE BETCO 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sewer Division 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kelly Cortum Inc 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.