Central cooling equipment and piping installation · California

Crown Energy Services, Inc.

San Francisco, CA · ~4,371 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crown Energy Services, Inc. runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Central cooling equipment and piping installation workplace, earning a grade C.

Crown Energy Services, Inc.: 2.9 TCR = 103% of Central cooling equipment and piping installation BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crown Energy Services, Inc. safety composite

Crown Energy Services, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Crown Energy Services, Inc.: 2.9 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 3.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.39× in 2021

Crown Energy Services, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.5 from 2.9 in 2019 to 3.4 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 103% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #222/594
  • PHOTO Bruce Mechanical, Inc.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 355 inj
  • SIZE ~4,371 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bruce Mechanical, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Crown Energy Services, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crown Energy Services, Inc. averages 2.9 TCR (103% of the Central cooling equipment and piping installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crown Energy Services, Inc. TCR series: 2019=2.9 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=3.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Crown Energy Services, Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Central cooling equipment and establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #222 safest of 594 Central cooling equipment and employers in California.

Crown Energy Services, Inc. (4,371 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Crown Energy Services, Inc.
Crown Energy Services, Inc. (4,371 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Crown Energy Services, Inc. has more employees than the Central cooling equipment and piping ins median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.4 1.1 140 5 0
2020 2.3 1.7 87 10 0
2019 2.9 2.2 128 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · CA · San Francisco

5,793 Central cooling equipment and piping installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bruce Mechanical, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anchor Mechanical, LLC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carrier Commercial Services (Salt Lake) 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midwestern Mechanical-Sioux Falls 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sutter Valley Hospitals (30003) 4,383 FTE
STATE-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : OAK4 4,358 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flagship 4,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR CSS Farms - Colorado City 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 42321a - Brooklyn Dc 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Greif-Riverville 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Darby Doors LLC HQ-Main 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Canon Solutions America 4,371 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-AA-PHL-PHILADELPHIA-PHL-TRML 4,366 FTE
NAT-SIZE Textron Aviation - Mid Continent 4,359 FTE
NAT-SIZE Apache Industrial Services - Corporate Operations 4,358 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.