Railroad cars and car equipment manufacturing · Illinois

CRRC Sifang America Incorporated Facility

Chicago, IL · ~191 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CRRC Sifang America Incorporated Facility runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Railroad cars and car equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

CRRC Sifang America Incorporated Facility: 4.4 TCR = 132% of Railroad cars and car equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CRRC Sifang America Incorporated Facility safety composite

CRRC Sifang America Incorporated Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2022→2023

CRRC Sifang America Incorporated Facility injury rate improved

CRRC Sifang America Incorporated Facility's TCR fell 3.2 from 6.0 in 2022 to 2.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=6.0 · 2023=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336510 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 132% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #13/21
  • PHOTO Miller Felpax Corpor…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~191 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Miller Felpax Corporation (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

CRRC Sifang America Incorporated Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CRRC Sifang America Incorporated Facility averages 4.4 TCR (132% of the Railroad cars and car equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CRRC Sifang America Incorporated Facility TCR series: 2022=6 · 2023=2.8 · BLS 3.3

Where CRRC Sifang America Incorporated Facility falls in its industry

208 Railroad cars and car equipmen establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 21 Railroad cars and car equipmen employers in Illinois.

CRRC Sifang America Incorporated Facility (191 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate CRRC Sifang America Incorporated Facility
CRRC Sifang America Incorporated Facility (191 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.3

CRRC Sifang America Incorporated Facility has more employees than the Railroad cars and car equipment manufact median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.8 2.8 6 0 0
2022 6.0 4.2 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336510 · IL · Chicago

208 Railroad cars and car equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Miller Felpax Corporation 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant 1 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silvis 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kawasaki Rail Car Inc - New Haven 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Urban Elevator Service, LLC 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metropolis-HSEMS 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roho Inc 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Chemical Northlake 191 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR D & R Trucking 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR UPMC Horizon (Greenville) 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Angola Wire Products, Inc 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 228g Lci 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE AC Sales/Service - United States 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston Processing 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE IPS Group Inc. 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE 110 - Tallahassee 191 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.