Warehousing and storage, general merchandise · North Carolina

C&S Distributing, Inc

Greensboro, NC · ~20 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

C&S Distributing, Inc runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Warehousing and storage, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade B.

C&S Distributing, Inc: 3.8 TCR = 66% of Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

C&S Distributing, Inc safety composite

C&S Distributing, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

C&S Distributing, Inc held a steady TCR band

C&S Distributing, Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=11.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=8.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Greensboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.8 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #201/330
  • PHOTO Mt. Pleasant
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mt. Pleasant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

C&S Distributing, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows C&S Distributing, Inc averages 3.8 TCR (66% of the Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

C&S Distributing, Inc TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=11 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=8.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where C&S Distributing, Inc falls in its industry

9,477 Warehousing and storage, gener establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #201 safest of 330 Warehousing and storage, gener employers in North Carolina.

C&S Distributing, Inc (20 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate C&S Distributing, Inc
C&S Distributing, Inc (20 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

C&S Distributing, Inc has fewer employees than the Warehousing and storage, general merchan median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 8.1 0.0 2 0 0
2021 7.8 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 11.0 0.0 3 0 0
2018 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NC · Greensboro

9,477 Warehousing and storage, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mt. Pleasant 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tropical Shipping USA, LLC 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 30681 CAPSTONE - PETCO BRASELTON GA 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - CMH4 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Steve Thomas Farms 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kent Smith Farms 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ron Richmond 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thomas Family Farms, Inc. 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR Parklands Care Center 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Montgomery 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Vcf 029 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Thorstad Construction Co. Inc 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bluewater Thermal Solutions - Ridgway 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bluewater Thermal Solutions - Houston Heat Treat 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbia DREMC 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.