Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

CSL Double Creek 2018, LLC

Round Rock, TX · ~55 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CSL Double Creek 2018, LLC runs at 164% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

CSL Double Creek 2018, LLC: 6.2 TCR = 164% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CSL Double Creek 2018, LLC safety composite

CSL Double Creek 2018, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−332.3

2021→2024

CSL Double Creek 2018, LLC injury rate improved

CSL Double Creek 2018, LLC's TCR fell 332.3 from 336.9 in 2021 to 4.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 336.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=336.9 · 2022=9.1 · 2023=5.0 · 2024=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Round Rock, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 164% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #230/470
  • PHOTO Masonicare Ashlar Vi…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Masonicare Ashlar Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

CSL Double Creek 2018, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CSL Double Creek 2018, LLC averages 6.2 TCR (164% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CSL Double Creek 2018, LLC TCR series: 2021=336.9 · 2022=9.1 · 2023=5 · 2024=4.6 · BLS 3.8

Where CSL Double Creek 2018, LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #230 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

CSL Double Creek 2018, LLC (55 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate CSL Double Creek 2018, LLC
CSL Double Creek 2018, LLC (55 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

CSL Double Creek 2018, LLC has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.6 4.6 2 0 0
2023 5.0 5.0 2 0 0
2022 9.1 4.5 4 0 0
2021 336.9 224.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · Round Rock

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 203 employers in Round Rock, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Masonicare Ashlar Village 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Monroe Square Memory Care 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Christopher Heights of Northampton 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Loma Linda 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CHAMPION FEEDERS 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE SANTA GERTRUDIS 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE SWISHER COUNTY CATTLE COMPANY 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harwood Complex 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR US TX Round Rock Office 01 5,052 FTE
CITY-NEAR Round Rock 2 1,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR US TX Round Rock Office 07 1,735 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Round Rock 1,576 FTE
NAT-TCR 5089 Pittston Rdc 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rieth-Riley - Lansing 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Renteria Vineyard Management 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Stewart's Lawn Care 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ridgeview Health and Rehab Center 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE CBS iFOAM LLC 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Huron Tool & Engineering 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE MCO-7100 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.