Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

CSL Midlothian 2017, LLC

Midlothian, TX · ~82 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CSL Midlothian 2017, LLC runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

CSL Midlothian 2017, LLC: 6.4 TCR = 169% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CSL Midlothian 2017, LLC safety composite

CSL Midlothian 2017, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−220.2

2021→2024

CSL Midlothian 2017, LLC injury rate improved

CSL Midlothian 2017, LLC's TCR fell 220.2 from 228.1 in 2021 to 7.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 228.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=228.1 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=7.8 · 2024=7.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Midlothian, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 169% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #241/470
  • PHOTO Braemar Living at Me…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Braemar Living at Medford (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

CSL Midlothian 2017, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CSL Midlothian 2017, LLC averages 6.4 TCR (169% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CSL Midlothian 2017, LLC TCR series: 2021=228.1 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=7.8 · 2024=7.8 · BLS 3.8

Where CSL Midlothian 2017, LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #241 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

CSL Midlothian 2017, LLC (82 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate CSL Midlothian 2017, LLC
CSL Midlothian 2017, LLC (82 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

CSL Midlothian 2017, LLC has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.8 3.1 5 0 0
2023 7.8 4.7 5 0 0
2022 3.7 1.9 2 0 0
2021 228.1 228.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · Midlothian

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 52 employers in Midlothian, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Braemar Living at Medford 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waltonwood Cary Parkway IL 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windsor Manor Nevada 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clifton Senior Care, LLC 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE MORTELLARO'S NURSERY LTD SCHERTZ, TX 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midland 11700 Onyx Dr, Midland, TX 79706 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maverick Well Pluggers 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rocker A Well Service, Inc. 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gerdau North America Steel Midlothian Mill 2,921 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3801 - Midlothian DC 1,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3801 - Midlothian TX DC 1,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gerdau Midlothian 429 FTE
NAT-TCR 4029 Corvallis 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Al's IV, Inc. 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bethany Athletic Club 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Growing Stillness Corporation 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 8572 Morgan Hill 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2611 Brockton 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6217 Wallingford 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6618 Merced 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.