Tomato harvesting machines manufacturing · California

ctm

Madera, CA · ~64 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ctm runs at 192% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Tomato harvesting machines manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

ctm: 6.3 TCR = 192% of Tomato harvesting machines manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ctm safety composite

ctm scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2017→2018

ctm injury rate improved

ctm's TCR fell 5.8 from 9.2 in 2017 to 3.4 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.2 · 2018=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333111 · Madera, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 192% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #20/45
  • PHOTO C-Lock Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: C-Lock Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

ctm in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ctm averages 6.3 TCR (192% of the Tomato harvesting machines manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ctm TCR series: 2017=9.2 · 2018=3.4 · BLS 3.3

Where ctm falls in its industry

433 Tomato harvesting machines man establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 45 Tomato harvesting machines man employers in California.

ctm (64 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate ctm
ctm (64 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2

ctm has fewer employees than the Tomato harvesting machines manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.4 0.0 2 0 0
2017 9.2 7.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333111 · CA · Madera

433 Tomato harvesting machines manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 162 employers in Madera, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR C-Lock Inc 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR GSI : Paris 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Construction Implements Depot 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orchard Harvest Corporation 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms, Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDERA 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGS FARM LABOR CORPORATION 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arroyo Seco Vineyards, Inc 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pacific Farm Management Inc 17,529 FTE
CITY-NEAR Petroff Ag Services Inc 2,253 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 170 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Madera 1,393 FTE
NAT-TCR 23 - Theisen's - Black River Falls 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri Cities Nursing & Rehab 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR East Jordan Plastics South Haven Facility 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR St Charles Health System Prineville 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jackson Emc - Gainesville 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mack StressCon 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Electrical Contractor 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brian Center Health & Retirement/Monroe 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.