Continuing care retirement communities · Pennsylvania

Cumberland Crossings Retirement Community

Carlisle, PA · ~103 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
24.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cumberland Crossings Retirement Community runs at 646% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Cumberland Crossings Retirement Community: 24.6 TCR = 646% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cumberland Crossings Retirement Community safety composite

Cumberland Crossings Retirement Community scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 9% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

4/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 24.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2017→2021

Cumberland Crossings Retirement Community injury rate improved

Cumberland Crossings Retirement Community's TCR fell 1.2 from 15.2 in 2017 to 14.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 46.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=15.2 · 2018=36.0 · 2019=11.0 · 2020=46.6 · 2021=14.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Carlisle, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 24.6 · 646% of ind

  • DART 14.0 DART
  • RANK #255/257
  • PHOTO The Residence at Vin…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Residence at Vinnin Square (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Cumberland Crossings Retirement Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cumberland Crossings Retirement Community averages 24.6 TCR (646% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cumberland Crossings Retirement Community TCR series: 2017=15.2 · 2018=36 · 2019=11 · 2020=46.6 · 2021=14 · BLS 3.8

Where Cumberland Crossings Retirement Community falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #255 safest of 257 Continuing care retirement com employers in Pennsylvania.

Cumberland Crossings Retirement Community (103 employees, TCR 24.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Cumberland Crossings Retirement Community
Cumberland Crossings Retirement Community (103 employees, TCR 24.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Cumberland Crossings Retirement Community has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 14.0 14.0 3 7 0
2020 46.6 42.5 5 29 1
2019 11.0 9.6 7 1 0
2018 36.0 22.1 14 12 0
2017 15.2 13.7 3 7 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Carlisle

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 165 employers in Carlisle, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Residence at Vinnin Square 24.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Serenity Place on 7th Assisted Living 24.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pisgah Valley Retirement Center 24.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parkside North East 24.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE GMC Far 2 Giorgi Mushroom Farm 2 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE E.E. Austin & Son, Inc. 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE GSM Roofing 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Philadelphia D&M INC COMCAST 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corp Office Carlisle PA 1,191 FTE
CITY-NEAR DB Schenker--Carlisle 1,103 FTE
CITY-NEAR CCM 984 FTE
CITY-NEAR PACAS - CARLISLE 902 FTE
NAT-TCR Resource Recovery 24.6 TCR
NAT-TCR LQ2009 Anaheim 24.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Culligan Water 24.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HG1028 24.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harding's Marketplace #423 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE construction 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Roofing 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE CommScope (Forest, VA) 103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.