Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Cumberland Village Assisted Living

Fayetteville, NC · ~34 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cumberland Village Assisted Living runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Cumberland Village Assisted Living: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cumberland Village Assisted Living safety composite

Cumberland Village Assisted Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cumberland Village Assisted Living held a steady TCR band

Cumberland Village Assisted Living's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.0 TCR.

2019=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Fayetteville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/356
  • PHOTO Brookdale chapel hill
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale chapel hill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Cumberland Village Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cumberland Village Assisted Living averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Cumberland Village Assisted Living TCR series: 2019=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Cumberland Village Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Cumberland Village Assisted Living (34 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cumberland Village Assisted Living
Cumberland Village Assisted Living (34 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Cumberland Village Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Fayetteville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 317 employers in Fayetteville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale chapel hill 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kinship Pointe Seward 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Conway 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Centennial Park 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE MGF Logistics LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE CVP - TVRH Holly Springs 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Whaley Foodservice-Raleigh 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shamrock Construction & Remediation LLC 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cape Fear Valley Health System/Cumberland County 5,925 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company - Fayetteville 2,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Cumberland 2,104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Fayetteville 2,044 FTE
NAT-TCR Integration Appliance Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 128 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Siliconature 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Factory Plaza Inc, 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tormenta FC, LLC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Calvey Incorporated 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.