325998 All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product and Preparation Manufacturing · South Carolina

Cummins Charleston ReCon Plant

North Charleston, SC · ~220 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cummins Charleston ReCon Plant runs at 222% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical 325998 All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product and Preparation Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Cummins Charleston ReCon Plant: 7.3 TCR = 222% of 325998 All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product and Preparation Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cummins Charleston ReCon Plant safety composite

Cummins Charleston ReCon Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cummins Charleston ReCon Plant: 6.3 → 7.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 8.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.84× in 2024

Cummins Charleston ReCon Plant's TCR rose 1.3 from 6.3 in 2022 to 7.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325998 · North Charleston, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 222% of ind

  • DART 6.2 DART
  • RANK #11/11
  • PHOTO Spring Hill
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~220 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spring Hill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Cummins Charleston ReCon Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cummins Charleston ReCon Plant averages 7.3 TCR (222% of the 325998 All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product and Preparation Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cummins Charleston ReCon Plant TCR series: 2022=6.3 · 2023=8 · 2024=7.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Cummins Charleston ReCon Plant falls in its industry

485 325998 All Other Miscellaneous establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 11 325998 All Other Miscellaneous employers in South Carolina.

Cummins Charleston ReCon Plant (220 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cummins Charleston ReCon Plant
Cummins Charleston ReCon Plant (220 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Cummins Charleston ReCon Plant has more employees than the 325998 All Other Miscellaneous Chemical median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.6 6.2 16 0 0
2023 8.0 6.5 15 1 0
2022 6.3 5.2 10 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325998 · SC · North Charleston

485 325998 All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product and Preparation Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 256 employers in North Charleston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spring Hill 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Macdermid Inc 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highline Warren Wilmington 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR GHL International Inc 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Milliken Pendleton Plant 220 FTE
STATE-SIZE DSM nutritional products Kingstree 220 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zeus Aiken 220 FTE
STATE-SIZE Owen Steel 220 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charleston County 2,601 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Goodwill Services 1,105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trident Medical Center 1,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR SRC Charleston ISS Division 815 FTE
NAT-TCR Peace Harbor Hospital Main Campus 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR O'Brien Steel Service- Lacon 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Snow Hill 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Caniff Electric Supply - Hamtramck, MI 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Creation Technologies - Minnesota 220 FTE
NAT-SIZE DG Foods La 220 FTE
NAT-SIZE Environment Control 439 220 FTE
NAT-SIZE Electric Mirror 220 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.