Generators for gas-electric and oil-electric vehicles, manufacturing · Minnesota

Cummins Power Systems Fridley

Fridley, MN · ~1,052 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cummins Power Systems Fridley runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Generators for gas-electric and oil-electric vehicles, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Cummins Power Systems Fridley: 0.8 TCR = 23% of Generators for gas-electric and oil-electric vehicles, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cummins Power Systems Fridley safety composite

Cummins Power Systems Fridley scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2018

Cummins Power Systems Fridley injury rate improved

Cummins Power Systems Fridley's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.5 in 2016 to 0.4 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.5 · 2017=0.4 · 2018=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335312 · Fridley, MN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #1/9
  • PHOTO Power Conversion : P…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~1,052 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Power Conversion : PC Services North America (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Cummins Power Systems Fridley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cummins Power Systems Fridley averages 0.8 TCR (23% of the Generators for gas-electric and oil-electric vehicles, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cummins Power Systems Fridley TCR series: 2016=1.5 · 2017=0.4 · 2018=0.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Cummins Power Systems Fridley falls in its industry

222 Generators for gas-electric an establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 9 Generators for gas-electric an employers in Minnesota.

Cummins Power Systems Fridley (1,052 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Cummins Power Systems Fridley
Cummins Power Systems Fridley (1,052 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Cummins Power Systems Fridley has more employees than the Generators for gas-electric and oil-elec median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.4 0.4 4 0 0
2017 0.4 0.2 4 0 0
2016 1.5 0.6 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335312 · MN · Fridley

222 Generators for gas-electric and oil-electric vehicles, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 134 employers in Fridley, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Power Conversion : PC Services North America 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Climco Coils 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flowery Branch - 4349 Avery Drive 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABB Motors and Mechanical, Inc. - Fort Smith 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE NCS Pearson - Bloomington 1,053 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayo Collaborative Services, LLC 1,051 FTE
STATE-SIZE rms Company 1,058 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2573-MN102 1,044 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,053 FTE
CITY-NEAR Operational Headquarters 1,637 FTE
CITY-NEAR US, MN Fridley, Cummins Power Systems 1,451 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cummins Power Systems - Fridley 1,183 FTE
NAT-TCR El Dorado Branch 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR County Market #511 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hydro - Portland Fabricated Components 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR South Customer Service Center 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rich Gen Office(Ojrp) 1,052 FTE
NAT-SIZE 036365-Phoenix Az P&Dc 1,052 FTE
NAT-SIZE Truckee Meadows Community College 1,052 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - BOS7 1,052 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.