Garage door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation · Kentucky

Cunningham Door & Window

Louisville, KY · ~48 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cunningham Door & Window runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Garage door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation workplace, earning a grade B.

Cunningham Door & Window: 1.7 TCR = 60% of Garage door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cunningham Door & Window safety composite

Cunningham Door & Window scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cunningham Door & Window held a steady TCR band

Cunningham Door & Window's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=2.2 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Louisville, KY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 60% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/19
  • PHOTO D20 Toledo
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: D20 Toledo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Cunningham Door & Window in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cunningham Door & Window averages 1.7 TCR (60% of the Garage door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cunningham Door & Window TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.2 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Cunningham Door & Window falls in its industry

1,138 Garage door, commercial- or in establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 19 Garage door, commercial- or in employers in Kentucky.

Cunningham Door & Window (48 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cunningham Door & Window
Cunningham Door & Window (48 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Cunningham Door & Window has fewer employees than the Garage door, commercial- or industrial-t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.7 4.7 2 0 0
2021 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2017 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · KY · Louisville

1,138 Garage door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 1,638 employers in Louisville, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR D20 Toledo 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schindler Hanover Elevator Plant 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Division 2 - Portland 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Connecticut 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Peterson Farms 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cane Run Station 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bri-Den Roofing 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dirt Works Unlimited 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jefferson County Public Schools 18,524 FTE
CITY-NEAR KYGRA - WORLDPORT 11,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR WORLDPORT (KYGRA) 9,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR KTKY TRUCK 8,757 FTE
NAT-TCR Trinity Rail Maintenance Services #4034 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hiller Chesapeake 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Phillips Auto Group of Bradley, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Piggly Wiggly 183 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4203 - Tampa, FL 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Virginia 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Tube and Steel Corporation Kent Branch 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Golner Precision Products, Inc. 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.