Engines and parts (except diesel), automotive and truck, manufacturing · Texas

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc

San Antonio, TX · ~37 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Engines and parts (except diesel), automotive and truck, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc: 6.2 TCR = 114% of Engines and parts (except diesel), automotive and truck, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc safety composite

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc: 2.1 → 10.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 10.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.73× in 2024

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc's TCR rose 8.6 from 2.1 in 2022 to 10.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336310 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 6.2 · 114% of ind

  • DART 10.7 DART
  • RANK #7/10
  • PHOTO Walbro LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Walbro LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Curtis Maruyasu America Inc averages 6.2 TCR (114% of the Engines and parts (except diesel), automotive and truck, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc TCR series: 2022=2.1 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=10.7 · BLS 5.4

Where Curtis Maruyasu America Inc falls in its industry

221 Engines and parts (except dies establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 10 Engines and parts (except dies employers in Texas.

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc (37 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Curtis Maruyasu America Inc
Curtis Maruyasu America Inc (37 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc has fewer employees than the Engines and parts (except diesel), autom median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.7 10.7 4 0 0
2023 5.8 3.8 3 0 0
2022 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336310 · TX · San Antonio

221 Engines and parts (except diesel), automotive and truck, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Walbro LLC 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Camshaft Acquisition, Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kawasaki TN 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Skilled Manufacturing - Automotive Division 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fannin Growing 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bovina Cattle Company 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Skyland Grain, LLC- Spearman Gin 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alura Cogen 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR New England Building Supply 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sierra Packaging & Converting, LLC 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR SiteOne Landscape Supply #1069 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Phx-Technical Operations 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lakeside Industries - Lacey 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shasta Wood Products, Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE RAMCO Dba Arcosa Crushed Concrete 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big R of Pueblo West, LLC. 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.