Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines · Michigan

Skilled Manufacturing - Automotive Division

Traverse Ctiy, MI · ~115 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Skilled Manufacturing - Automotive Division runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines workplace, earning a grade C.

Skilled Manufacturing - Automotive Division: 6.1 TCR = 114% of Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines BLS 5.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Skilled Manufacturing - Automotive Division safety composite

Skilled Manufacturing - Automotive Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Skilled Manufacturing - Automotive Division: 8.1 → 12.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 12.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.87× in 2023

Skilled Manufacturing - Automotive Division's TCR rose 4.6 from 8.1 in 2018 to 12.6 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336310 · Traverse Ctiy, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.1 · 114% of ind

  • DART 11.5 DART
  • RANK #46/55
  • PHOTO Kawasaki TN
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kawasaki TN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Skilled Manufacturing - Automotive Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Skilled Manufacturing - Automotive Division averages 6.1 TCR (114% of the Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Skilled Manufacturing - Automotive Division TCR series: 2018=8.1 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=6.4 · 2023=12.6 · BLS 5.4

Where Skilled Manufacturing - Automotive Division falls in its industry

221 Assembly line rebuilding of au establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 55 Assembly line rebuilding of au employers in Michigan.

Skilled Manufacturing - Automotive Division (115 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Skilled Manufacturing - Automotive Division
Skilled Manufacturing - Automotive Division (115 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Skilled Manufacturing - Automotive Division has fewer employees than the Assembly line rebuilding of automotive a median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 12.6 11.5 11 0 0
2022 6.4 4.6 7 0 0
2021 3.5 2.3 3 0 0
2020 3.9 2.6 3 0 0
2019 2.4 1.6 3 0 0
2018 8.1 4.7 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336310 · MI · Traverse Ctiy

221 Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kawasaki TN 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Curtis Maruyasu America Inc 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walbro LLC 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Camshaft Acquisition, Inc. 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ferris Coffee & Nut Co. 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pumford Construction 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE PLUMBING AND HVAC 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Advanced Food Technologies 115 FTE
NAT-TCR Northern Westchester 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Frank Gargiulo & Son, Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Koval Lane Hospitality 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Cornersburg Sparkle 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE BrandSafway Services, LLC - Los Angeles Branch 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hawthorne Healthcare & Wellness Center 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Major Products Co., Inc. 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mechanicville #094 115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.