Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe · Indiana

Curtis Products, Inc.

South Bend, IN · ~158 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Curtis Products, Inc. runs at 145% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe workplace, earning a grade D.

Curtis Products, Inc.: 4.8 TCR = 145% of Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Curtis Products, Inc. safety composite

Curtis Products, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−107.7

2018→2024

Curtis Products, Inc. injury rate improved

Curtis Products, Inc.'s TCR fell 107.7 from 113.1 in 2018 to 5.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 113.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=113.1 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332996 · South Bend, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 145% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #14/22
  • PHOTO PITTSBURGH TUBULAR S…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~158 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PITTSBURGH TUBULAR SHAFTING, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Curtis Products, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Curtis Products, Inc. averages 4.8 TCR (145% of the Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Curtis Products, Inc. TCR series: 2018=113.1 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=5.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Curtis Products, Inc. falls in its industry

337 Pipe fabricating (i.e., bendin establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 22 Pipe fabricating (i.e., bendin employers in Indiana.

Curtis Products, Inc. (158 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Curtis Products, Inc.
Curtis Products, Inc. (158 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Curtis Products, Inc. has more employees than the Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.4 2.7 6 0 0
2023 4.2 2.8 6 0 0
2018 113.1 75.4 20 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332996 · IN · South Bend

337 Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 318 employers in South Bend, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PITTSBURGH TUBULAR SHAFTING, INC. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR KOP 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jett Cutting Service, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Pipe Line Development Company 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Midwestern Electric LLC 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kerry-Evansville 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jet Technologies, Inc. 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ottenweller Company, Inc. Fort Wayne Headquarters 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital South Bend 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph County 1,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fourwinds Casino South Bend 1,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR Honeywell IN08 810 FTE
NAT-TCR Corner Pantry Hermosa 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Salt Lake City- Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc. / FFE Transportation 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - PHL1 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR McCrite Plaza Retirement 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sandstone of Tucson Rehab Center 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Family Health & Rehab 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diamond Pet Foods Lathrop 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE BWI-GH 158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.