Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe · Pennsylvania

KOP

King of Prussia, PA · ~72 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

KOP runs at 146% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe workplace, earning a grade D.

KOP: 4.8 TCR = 146% of Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

KOP safety composite

KOP scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.9

2016→2024

KOP injury rate improved

KOP's TCR fell 10.9 from 16.0 in 2016 to 5.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 16.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=9.5 · 2024=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332996 · King of Prussia, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 146% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #13/28
  • PHOTO Curtis Products, Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 64 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Curtis Products, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

KOP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows KOP averages 4.8 TCR (146% of the Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

KOP TCR series: 2016=16 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=9.5 · 2024=5.1 · BLS 3.3

Where KOP falls in its industry

337 Pipe fabricating (i.e., bendin establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 28 Pipe fabricating (i.e., bendin employers in Pennsylvania.

KOP (72 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate KOP
KOP (72 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.3

KOP has more employees than the Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.1 5.1 1 0 0
2023 9.5 7.6 5 0 0
2022 6.3 4.2 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.7 4.7 2 0 0
2019 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 16.0 9.2 52 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332996 · PA · King of Prussia

337 Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 183 employers in King of Prussia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Curtis Products, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR PITTSBURGH TUBULAR SHAFTING, INC. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jett Cutting Service, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Pipe Line Development Company 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Esbenshade Mount Joy 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maple Lawn Associates 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kreider Farms - Middletown Egg 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ken Davis Mushroom Farms 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR 199897 9,243 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Valley Forge (1029) 2,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSL Behring, King of Prussia 1,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DPH2 1,109 FTE
NAT-TCR Frei Ranch Winery 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Renown Regional Hospital 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Galaxy Patterson Road LLC 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Haworth Walls 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE LaPerle's IGA 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE St Pete Delivery Inc 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Motion Laboratories Inc. 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Evergreen Village Supportive Living 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.