Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · New York

Curtiss-Wright -- Farmingdale (Sensors)

Farmingdale, NY · ~50 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Curtiss-Wright -- Farmingdale (Sensors) runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Curtiss-Wright -- Farmingdale (Sensors): 1.3 TCR = 38% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Curtiss-Wright -- Farmingdale (Sensors) safety composite

Curtiss-Wright -- Farmingdale (Sensors) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Curtiss-Wright -- Farmingdale (Sensors): 0.0 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 2.5 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2020

Curtiss-Wright -- Farmingdale (Sensors)'s TCR rose 2.5 from 0.0 in 2019 to 2.5 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Farmingdale, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 38% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #5/13
  • PHOTO Birken Manufacturing…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Birken Manufacturing Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Curtiss-Wright -- Farmingdale (Sensors) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Curtiss-Wright -- Farmingdale (Sensors) averages 1.3 TCR (38% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Curtiss-Wright -- Farmingdale (Sensors) TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Curtiss-Wright -- Farmingdale (Sensors) falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 13 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in New York.

Curtiss-Wright -- Farmingdale (Sensors) (50 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Curtiss-Wright -- Farmingdale (Sensors)
Curtiss-Wright -- Farmingdale (Sensors) (50 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Curtiss-Wright -- Farmingdale (Sensors) has fewer employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · NY · Farmingdale

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 116 employers in Farmingdale, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Birken Manufacturing Company 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CTL Aerospace Inc. OEM 2 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain : Durham, NC 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain Terre Haute IN 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Construction Group 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vacri Construction Corporation 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rifenburg Contracting Corporation 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lancaster Development, Inc. 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR MELVILLE (NYMEL) 858 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYMEL - MELVILLE 828 FTE
CITY-NEAR 022 Farmingdale 820 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5295 582 FTE
NAT-TCR Cambridge Ohio 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR CBO Danvers 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Spieker Company 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake County Hauling 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE UNIT512 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Badass Farming LLC 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spee-Dee Delivery Service, Inc. - Cedar Rapids 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE MMP - 1577 Congress St 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.