Angle valves, industrial-type, manufacturing · New York

Curtiss Wright - Target Rock

Farmingdale, NY · ~292 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Curtiss Wright - Target Rock runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Angle valves, industrial-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Curtiss Wright - Target Rock: 3.6 TCR = 108% of Angle valves, industrial-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Curtiss Wright - Target Rock safety composite

Curtiss Wright - Target Rock scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2023

Curtiss Wright - Target Rock injury rate improved

Curtiss Wright - Target Rock's TCR fell 0.6 from 1.7 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 11.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.7 · 2017=1.6 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=11.8 · 2023=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332911 · Farmingdale, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 108% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #9/12
  • PHOTO The Ford Meter Box C…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~292 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Ford Meter Box Company, Inc. (Wabash) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Curtiss Wright - Target Rock in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Curtiss Wright - Target Rock averages 3.6 TCR (108% of the Angle valves, industrial-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Curtiss Wright - Target Rock TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=1.6 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=11.8 · 2023=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Curtiss Wright - Target Rock falls in its industry

298 Angle valves, industrial-type, establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 12 Angle valves, industrial-type, employers in New York.

Curtiss Wright - Target Rock (292 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Curtiss Wright - Target Rock
Curtiss Wright - Target Rock (292 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Curtiss Wright - Target Rock has more employees than the Angle valves, industrial-type, manufactu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.1 0.3 4 0 0
2022 11.8 8.8 5 34 0
2021 5.4 2.0 6 10 0
2020 2.8 2.1 5 4 0
2019 0.7 0.3 2 0 0
2017 1.6 1.6 4 0 0
2016 1.7 1.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332911 · NY · Farmingdale

298 Angle valves, industrial-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 116 employers in Farmingdale, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Ford Meter Box Company, Inc. (Wabash) 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gulf Coast Modification L.P. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crane ChemPharma Flow Systems / XOMOX 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spirax Sarco, Inc. - Northpoint 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE D05 Manhattan Maint & Repair 292 FTE
STATE-SIZE TC Ultra Flex 292 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corning Incorporated Canton Plant 292 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1948 - Medford 292 FTE
CITY-NEAR MELVILLE (NYMEL) 858 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYMEL - MELVILLE 828 FTE
CITY-NEAR 022 Farmingdale 820 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5295 582 FTE
NAT-TCR Dong A-USA, INC 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR NovelAire Technologies LLC 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MEC Enterprises of Ocala LLC 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Claro's Arcadia 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Snyder's Lance Inc. - Beloit 292 FTE
NAT-SIZE Confluence Outdoor Inc. 292 FTE
NAT-SIZE Applied Construction Solutions, INC 292 FTE
NAT-SIZE Az Cmop 292 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.