Hardware, plastics, manufacturing · Minnesota

Custom Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc.

Lino Lakes, MN · ~18 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Custom Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Hardware, plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Custom Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc.: 1.6 TCR = 49% of Hardware, plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Custom Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. safety composite

Custom Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Custom Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Custom Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=6.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Lino Lakes, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 49% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/89
  • PHOTO East Brunswick (Plas…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~18 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: East Brunswick (Plastic) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Custom Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Custom Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. averages 1.6 TCR (49% of the Hardware, plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Custom Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=6.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Custom Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. falls in its industry

2,838 Hardware, plastics, manufactur establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 89 Hardware, plastics, manufactur employers in Minnesota.

Custom Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. (18 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Custom Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc.
Custom Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. (18 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Custom Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. has fewer employees than the Hardware, plastics, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.5 6.5 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · MN · Lino Lakes

2,838 Hardware, plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 42 employers in Lino Lakes, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR East Brunswick (Plastic) 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anomatic Corporation- Blacklick 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bedford Park Thermo 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Industrial Plastics LLC 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE WPI-Fieldstaff 18 FTE
STATE-SIZE Select Genetics MN Magnum 003-0138-MA 18 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mesabi Metallics 18 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vigen Construction- Erskine 18 FTE
CITY-NEAR YMCA in Lino Lakes 5,690 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Correctional Facility, Lino Lakes 516 FTE
CITY-NEAR MCF - Lino Lakes 420 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1448 - Lino Lakes 353 FTE
NAT-TCR Green Bay Packaging Inc 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Carolina Precision Technologies - Mooresville, NC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Harold R. Clune, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Gateway Aluminum 1.6 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.