Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing · Missouri

Custom Metalcraft (Plant 1)

Springfield, MO · ~65 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Custom Metalcraft (Plant 1) runs at 177% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Custom Metalcraft (Plant 1): 5.8 TCR = 177% of Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Custom Metalcraft (Plant 1) safety composite

Custom Metalcraft (Plant 1) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Custom Metalcraft (Plant 1): 3.0 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 7.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.27× in 2021

Custom Metalcraft (Plant 1)'s TCR rose 1.8 from 3.0 in 2016 to 4.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332439 · Springfield, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 177% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #8/16
  • PHOTO Cleveland Steel Cont…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cleveland Steel Container Corporation - Quakertown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Custom Metalcraft (Plant 1) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Custom Metalcraft (Plant 1) averages 5.8 TCR (177% of the Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Custom Metalcraft (Plant 1) TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=7.8 · 2020=7.8 · 2021=4.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Custom Metalcraft (Plant 1) falls in its industry

175 Containers, light gauge metal establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 16 Containers, light gauge metal employers in Missouri.

Custom Metalcraft (Plant 1) (65 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Custom Metalcraft (Plant 1)
Custom Metalcraft (Plant 1) (65 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Custom Metalcraft (Plant 1) has more employees than the Containers, light gauge metal (except ca median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.8 1.6 3 0 0
2020 7.8 1.6 5 0 0
2017 7.8 1.6 5 0 0
2016 3.0 1.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332439 · MO · Springfield

175 Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 633 employers in Springfield, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cleveland Steel Container Corporation - Quakertown 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR T&C Stainless, Inc 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lancaster Container, Inc 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Skolnik Industries, Inc 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE NW Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dodson Service Center 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Plant 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE J. M. Fahey Construction Company 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL SPRINGFIELD 4,885 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime, Inc. HQ 3,091 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corp 3,052 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bass Pro Corporate 1,888 FTE
NAT-TCR Arizona Finisher & Trans-Est 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ortonville Area Health Services 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bamboo Pipeline Camarillo 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Regent, The 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE STA-Iowa (IOA-000) 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sss Plantation Opco LLC 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Home Office 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2077-Us Dd Nw Jersey City Branch 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.