Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing · Missouri

T&C Stainless, Inc

Mount Vernon, MO · ~52 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

T&C Stainless, Inc runs at 179% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

T&C Stainless, Inc: 5.9 TCR = 179% of Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

T&C Stainless, Inc safety composite

T&C Stainless, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

T&C Stainless, Inc: 2.8 → 8.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 13.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.12× in 2024

T&C Stainless, Inc's TCR rose 6.1 from 2.8 in 2016 to 8.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 13.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332439 · Mount Vernon, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.9 · 179% of ind

  • DART 6.6 DART
  • RANK #9/16
  • PHOTO Cleveland Steel Cont…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cleveland Steel Container Corporation - Quakertown (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

T&C Stainless, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows T&C Stainless, Inc averages 5.9 TCR (179% of the Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

T&C Stainless, Inc TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=13.9 · 2021=7.6 · 2022=7.7 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=8.8 · BLS 3.3

Where T&C Stainless, Inc falls in its industry

175 Containers, light gauge metal establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 16 Containers, light gauge metal employers in Missouri.

T&C Stainless, Inc (52 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate T&C Stainless, Inc
T&C Stainless, Inc (52 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 4.7

T&C Stainless, Inc has fewer employees than the Containers, light gauge metal (except ca median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.8 6.6 4 0 0
2023 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 7.7 5.1 3 0 0
2021 7.6 5.1 3 0 0
2020 13.9 11.6 6 0 0
2019 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2018 5.2 5.2 0 2 0
2017 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.8 2.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332439 · MO · Mount Vernon

175 Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 10 employers in Mount Vernon, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cleveland Steel Container Corporation - Quakertown 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Custom Metalcraft (Plant 1) 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lancaster Container, Inc 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Skolnik Industries, Inc 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE KCP&L - F&M Metering Services 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Co-Mo Electric Cooperative - Lake Business Center 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woodard & Curran - PWSD #2 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Field 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Vernon 247 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 7249 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reyco Granning, LLC 145 FTE
CITY-NEAR 7249 145 FTE
NAT-TCR Waupaca Foundry, Inc. Plant 5 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Canonsburg Shop 'n Save 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR LTU 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR H & R Agripower - Tanner 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alameda Store 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hancock Store 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dyer Foods Rite 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Specialty Contractors LLC - Philadelphia 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.