Systems integration design services, computer · California

Cyber Medical Imaging, Inc.

Los Angeles, CA · ~29 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cyber Medical Imaging, Inc. runs at 278% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Systems integration design services, computer workplace, earning a grade F.

Cyber Medical Imaging, Inc.: 1.4 TCR = 278% of Systems integration design services, computer BLS 0.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cyber Medical Imaging, Inc. safety composite

Cyber Medical Imaging, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2018→2024

Cyber Medical Imaging, Inc. injury rate improved

Cyber Medical Imaging, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.1 from 4.1 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.1 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541512 · Los Angeles, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 1.4 · 278% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/19
  • PHOTO Ocado Solutions USA …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ocado Solutions USA Dallas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Cyber Medical Imaging, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cyber Medical Imaging, Inc. averages 1.4 TCR (278% of the Systems integration design services, computer BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cyber Medical Imaging, Inc. TCR series: 2018=4.1 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Cyber Medical Imaging, Inc. falls in its industry

181 Systems integration design ser establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 19 Systems integration design ser employers in California.

Cyber Medical Imaging, Inc. (29 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Cyber Medical Imaging, Inc.
Cyber Medical Imaging, Inc. (29 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3

Cyber Medical Imaging, Inc. has fewer employees than the Systems integration design services, com median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 4.1 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541512 · CA · Los Angeles

181 Systems integration design services, computer employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ocado Solutions USA Dallas 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR NetScout Berkeley 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MS - Chantilly, VA - 1CHVA 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cart.com - Florence 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sean V. Doherty Farms 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanco Farms, LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SHOP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cottonwood Farms 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Altronix 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Administration 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR B&G Painting, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Niagara Bottling, LLC - Mississippi 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sun Recycling 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE D1 Arlington Heights Yard 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE D1 Rodenburg Yard 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bardstown Store 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.