Rectifiers, electronic component-type (except semiconductor), manufacturing · New York

Altronix

Brooklyn, NY · ~208 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Altronix runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Rectifiers, electronic component-type (except semiconductor), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Altronix: 1.4 TCR = 42% of Rectifiers, electronic component-type (except semiconductor), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Altronix safety composite

Altronix scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2017→2024

Altronix injury rate improved

Altronix's TCR fell 0.5 from 1.5 in 2017 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.5 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334419 · Brooklyn, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #15/28
  • PHOTO Nelson Miller Group …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~208 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nelson Miller Group - City of Industry CA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Altronix in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Altronix averages 1.4 TCR (42% of the Rectifiers, electronic component-type (except semiconductor), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Altronix TCR series: 2017=1.5 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Altronix falls in its industry

334 Rectifiers, electronic compone establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 28 Rectifiers, electronic compone employers in New York.

Altronix (208 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Altronix
Altronix (208 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8

Altronix has more employees than the Rectifiers, electronic component-type (e median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.5 2 0 0
2023 1.6 1.0 3 0 0
2022 1.6 0.0 3 0 0
2021 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.9 1.4 4 0 0
2018 2.5 1.5 5 0 1
2017 1.5 1.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334419 · NY · Brooklyn

334 Rectifiers, electronic component-type (except semiconductor), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 941 employers in Brooklyn, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nelson Miller Group - City of Industry CA 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manufacturing Resources 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCB Piezotronics, Inc. - NC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kauffman Engineering, Inc. BRE 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Saint-Gobain ADFORS (Albion,NY) 208 FTE
STATE-SIZE Confer Plastics, Inc. 208 FTE
STATE-SIZE STOP & SHOP 100570 208 FTE
STATE-SIZE ShopRite of Vails Gate 208 FTE
CITY-NEAR EDI - Brooklyn 946 9,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR S & A Unified Home Care, Inc. 7,782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maimonides Medical Center 6,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospital - Brooklyn 5,690 FTE
NAT-TCR Cyber Medical Imaging, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Administration 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR B&G Painting, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Niagara Bottling, LLC - Mississippi 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Knoxville 074 208 FTE
NAT-SIZE GARDENA 208 FTE
NAT-SIZE O&M - San Joaquin Field Division 208 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waitex International Co Ltd 208 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.