Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Florida

Cypress Palms Senior Living

Largo, FL · ~87 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cypress Palms Senior Living runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Cypress Palms Senior Living: 3.0 TCR = 78% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cypress Palms Senior Living safety composite

Cypress Palms Senior Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cypress Palms Senior Living held a steady TCR band

Cypress Palms Senior Living's TCR held near 0.0 from 3.0 in 2022 to 3.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.0 · 2023=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Largo, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 78% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #70/396
  • PHOTO cottonwood manor ass…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: cottonwood manor assisted living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Cypress Palms Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cypress Palms Senior Living averages 3.0 TCR (78% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cypress Palms Senior Living TCR series: 2022=3 · 2023=3 · BLS 3.8

Where Cypress Palms Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #70 safest of 396 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

Cypress Palms Senior Living (87 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cypress Palms Senior Living
Cypress Palms Senior Living (87 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Cypress Palms Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2022 3.0 1.5 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · FL · Largo

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 165 employers in Largo, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR cottonwood manor assisted living 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR GrandeVille Senior Living Community 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR EMS - Vernon Terrace of Edina 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Providence Place of Lancaster 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Potato PH 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbia Care Florida LLC.-Arcadia 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services Lake City 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crystal River Nuclear Plant 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR BayCare Home Care Medical Supply (7251) 1,516 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA FLORIDA LARGO HOSPITAL 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR Largo Medical Center 1,027 FTE
CITY-NEAR Conmed - Largo 1,021 FTE
NAT-TCR County Market #026 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyard Boston Cambridge 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mika Metal Fabricating 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Building 17 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE BICO Drilling Tools, Inc. 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Janitorial Services (JBLM) 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Centennial & Denver 9001 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adams Vegetable Oils 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.