Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Wisconsin

cottonwood manor assisted living

Green Bay, WI · ~20 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

cottonwood manor assisted living runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

cottonwood manor assisted living: 3.0 TCR = 78% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

cottonwood manor assisted living safety composite

cottonwood manor assisted living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

cottonwood manor assisted living: 6.3 → 74.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 74.1 TCR · DART/TCR 5.55× in 2023

cottonwood manor assisted living's TCR rose 67.8 from 6.3 in 2016 to 74.1 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 5.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Green Bay, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 78% of ind

  • DART 16.5 DART
  • RANK #48/273
  • PHOTO Cypress Palms Senior…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cypress Palms Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

cottonwood manor assisted living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows cottonwood manor assisted living averages 3.0 TCR (78% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

cottonwood manor assisted living TCR series: 2016=6.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=8.5 · 2023=74.1 · BLS 3.8

Where cottonwood manor assisted living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 273 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

cottonwood manor assisted living (20 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate cottonwood manor assisted living
cottonwood manor assisted living (20 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

cottonwood manor assisted living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 74.1 16.5 7 2 0
2020 8.5 8.5 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WI · Green Bay

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 563 employers in Green Bay, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cypress Palms Senior Living 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR GrandeVille Senior Living Community 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR EMS - Vernon Terrace of Edina 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Providence Place of Lancaster 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alsum Farms Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE FGI West Salem 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE 760 Durand Agronomy 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE 764 Osseo Agronomy 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI005 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,296 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital Campus 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 300000170855522 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 2,379 FTE
NAT-TCR Pella Windows & Doors - RFD 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR R.T. Moore Co., Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MCR Allen Tenant LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Mid-America Heartland : SVC-TUL Broken Arrow OK-USA 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE DEBSTEEL, Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oxford NE 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skyworks LLC -- Syracuse branch 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skyworks LLC -- Knoxville branch 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.