Homes for the elderly with nursing care · Georgia

Cypress Pond Senior Care

Tifton, GA · ~46 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cypress Pond Senior Care runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade A.

Cypress Pond Senior Care: 2.7 TCR = 41% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cypress Pond Senior Care safety composite

Cypress Pond Senior Care scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.7

2020→2023

Cypress Pond Senior Care injury rate improved

Cypress Pond Senior Care's TCR fell 10.7 from 10.7 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=10.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Tifton, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.7 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/259
  • PHOTO Memorial Heights Nur…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Memorial Heights Nursing Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Cypress Pond Senior Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cypress Pond Senior Care averages 2.7 TCR (41% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cypress Pond Senior Care TCR series: 2020=10.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Cypress Pond Senior Care falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 259 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in Georgia.

Cypress Pond Senior Care (46 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cypress Pond Senior Care
Cypress Pond Senior Care (46 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Cypress Pond Senior Care has fewer employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 10.7 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · GA · Tifton

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 86 employers in Tifton, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Memorial Heights Nursing Center 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solaris Healthcare Imperial 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Life care center of elyria 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chippewa Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Corp 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE LITTE CREEK AG, LLC 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vision Stairways and Millwork 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cartersville Operating - 10 & 41 Massell Drive Cartersville 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGLC Riverdale LNG 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tift Regional Medical Center. 1,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0556 - Tifton GA DC 1,451 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0556 - Tifton DC 1,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heatcraft Refrigerated Products - Tifton 548 FTE
NAT-TCR Altorfer Inc. - Cedar Rapids, IA - 2550 6th Street SW 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Shriners Hospitasl for Children Medical Center - Lexington 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Aquatic Co. Elizabethtown 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Northside Family YMCA 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Blackstone NEY Ultrasonics 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE 032-Odessa/Clements St 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Engineered Materials : Gothenberg OES 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fabricated Metal Products 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.