Membership associations, civic or social · Virginia

Northside Family YMCA

Richmond, VA · ~52 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Northside Family YMCA runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Membership associations, civic or social workplace, earning a grade D.

Northside Family YMCA: 2.7 TCR = 128% of Membership associations, civic or social BLS 2.1 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Northside Family YMCA safety composite

Northside Family YMCA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2023

Northside Family YMCA injury rate improved

Northside Family YMCA's TCR fell 0.7 from 11.1 in 2016 to 10.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 11.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=10.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 813410 · Richmond, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.7 · 128% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #4/19
  • PHOTO RC Durr Family YMCA …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RC Durr Family YMCA Branch (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Northside Family YMCA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Northside Family YMCA averages 2.7 TCR (128% of the Membership associations, civic or social BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Northside Family YMCA TCR series: 2016=11.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=10.4 · BLS 2.1

Where Northside Family YMCA falls in its industry

298 Membership associations, civic establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 19 Membership associations, civic employers in Virginia.

Northside Family YMCA (52 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Northside Family YMCA
Northside Family YMCA (52 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Northside Family YMCA has fewer employees than the Membership associations, civic or social median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 10.4 5.2 1 1 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 11.1 7.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

813410 · VA · Richmond

298 Membership associations, civic or social employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 939 employers in Richmond, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RC Durr Family YMCA Branch 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlee Station Family YMCA 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR OCY - Brewster 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR YMCA Walla Walla 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Virginia Warehouse 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE CHARLOTTESVILLE-GAS 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Environmental Systems Service, Ltd. (Culpeper, VA) 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE 300-DREES-WASHINGTON DC 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR VCU Health System 14,536 FTE
CITY-NEAR Virginia Commonwealth University 11,826 FTE
CITY-NEAR VCU 5,271 FTE
CITY-NEAR CJW Medical Center 3,259 FTE
NAT-TCR Beacon Construction Services 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Shriners Hospitasl for Children Medical Center - Lexington 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Integrity Living Options - Central Office 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cypress Pond Senior Care 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cadbury Commons 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE North America : Karona 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Austin 804 Texas 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1100 Monroe Twp Board of Education 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.