School districts, elementary or secondary · Minnesota

DAC (District Admin Center)

New Ulm, MN · ~53 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DAC (District Admin Center) runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical School districts, elementary or secondary workplace, earning a grade A.

DAC (District Admin Center): 0.6 TCR = 41% of School districts, elementary or secondary BLS 1.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DAC (District Admin Center) safety composite

DAC (District Admin Center) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2017→2024

DAC (District Admin Center) injury rate improved

DAC (District Admin Center)'s TCR fell 3.5 from 3.5 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611110 · New Ulm, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #38/1589
  • PHOTO Gordonsville High Sc…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gordonsville High School (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

DAC (District Admin Center) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DAC (District Admin Center) averages 0.6 TCR (41% of the School districts, elementary or secondary BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DAC (District Admin Center) TCR series: 2017=3.5 · 2018=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.4

Where DAC (District Admin Center) falls in its industry

3,374 School districts, elementary o establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 1589 School districts, elementary o employers in Minnesota.

DAC (District Admin Center) (53 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate DAC (District Admin Center)
DAC (District Admin Center) (53 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8

DAC (District Admin Center) has fewer employees than the School districts, elementary or secondar median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611110 · MN · New Ulm

3,374 School districts, elementary or secondary employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 79 employers in New Ulm, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gordonsville High School 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ISD# 834-Central Services Building 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Illinois Valley High School 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Loyola High School of Baltimore, Inc. dba Loyola Blakefield 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Ottawa 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perham Breeder Farms 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wastewater Treatment Facility 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maertens- Brenny Construction Company 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR J&R Schugel Trucking, Inc. 926 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Ulm 722 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Ulm Medical Center 640 FTE
CITY-NEAR Martin Luther College 441 FTE
NAT-TCR DIRT T SHIRTS inc 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus 2 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR McGrath Volvo Cars of Fort Myers 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Riverstone Logistics Corporate Office 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Roberts Swiss Inc. 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mountain Meadows Senior Living Campus 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE GPD Optoelectronics Corp 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE GLOUCESTER 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.