Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Washington

Mountain Meadows Senior Living Campus

Leavenworth, WA · ~53 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mountain Meadows Senior Living Campus runs at 318% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Mountain Meadows Senior Living Campus: 12.1 TCR = 318% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mountain Meadows Senior Living Campus safety composite

Mountain Meadows Senior Living Campus scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mountain Meadows Senior Living Campus: 16.6 → 32.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 32.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.15× in 2024

Mountain Meadows Senior Living Campus's TCR rose 15.9 from 16.6 in 2019 to 32.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Leavenworth, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.1 · 318% of ind

  • DART 13.9 DART
  • RANK #77/109
  • PHOTO Evergreen Senior Liv…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Evergreen Senior Living- Decatur (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Mountain Meadows Senior Living Campus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mountain Meadows Senior Living Campus averages 12.1 TCR (318% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mountain Meadows Senior Living Campus TCR series: 2019=16.6 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=11.6 · 2024=32.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Mountain Meadows Senior Living Campus falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #77 safest of 109 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Mountain Meadows Senior Living Campus (53 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mountain Meadows Senior Living Campus
Mountain Meadows Senior Living Campus (53 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Mountain Meadows Senior Living Campus has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 32.5 13.9 7 0 0
2023 11.6 6.9 5 0 0
2022 4.9 4.9 2 0 0
2021 4.7 2.4 2 0 0
2020 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2019 16.6 11.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · WA · Leavenworth

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 12 employers in Leavenworth, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Evergreen Senior Living- Decatur 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Place 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adult Living at Rosebrook 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSL-Creston Village 12.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Doornink Fruit Ranch, Inc 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunray Farms LLC 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marcus J. Griggs Orchards 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE G&C Farms LLC 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cascade Medical 241 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6400-SWY-0027-0027-01589 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cascade Medical Center 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWY-0027-0027-01589 FAC-01589-LEAVENWORTH-WA 114 FTE
NAT-TCR creative design concepts inc 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - HSF5 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR GT Unlimited LLC 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Place 12.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Roberts Swiss Inc. 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE DAC (District Admin Center) 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE GPD Optoelectronics Corp 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE GLOUCESTER 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.