Air bag assemblies manufacturing · Arizona

Daicel Safety Systems America - Arizona

Mesa, AZ · ~175 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Daicel Safety Systems America - Arizona runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Air bag assemblies manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Daicel Safety Systems America - Arizona: 1.7 TCR = 32% of Air bag assemblies manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Daicel Safety Systems America - Arizona safety composite

Daicel Safety Systems America - Arizona scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Daicel Safety Systems America - Arizona: 2.3 → 3.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 3.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.53× in 2024

Daicel Safety Systems America - Arizona's TCR rose 0.8 from 2.3 in 2019 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Mesa, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.7 · 32% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO Yankton Facility
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~175 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Yankton Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Daicel Safety Systems America - Arizona in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Daicel Safety Systems America - Arizona averages 1.7 TCR (32% of the Air bag assemblies manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Daicel Safety Systems America - Arizona TCR series: 2019=2.3 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2024=3 · BLS 5.4

Where Daicel Safety Systems America - Arizona falls in its industry

772 Air bag assemblies manufacturi establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Air bag assemblies manufacturi employers in Arizona.

Daicel Safety Systems America - Arizona (175 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Daicel Safety Systems America - Arizona
Daicel Safety Systems America - Arizona (175 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Daicel Safety Systems America - Arizona has more employees than the Air bag assemblies manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 2.6 8 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.4 3.4 4 0 0
2019 2.3 2.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · AZ · Mesa

772 Air bag assemblies manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 565 employers in Mesa, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Yankton Facility 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Canton Controls 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 8462_19262 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Faurecia Exhaust Systems, Inc. 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Meritage Homes of Texas - Austin 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE IES Communications, LLC - Division Support 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE S & S Paving and Construction 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE Four Peaks 175 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZ001 4,193 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZAPW9668 AZA - RAMP PAX 3,181 FTE
CITY-NEAR 04-290370278-2 1,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Police Department H210 1,651 FTE
NAT-TCR Dan Post Boot Company Distribution Center 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR LaPorte Production Facility 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Fugro USA Land - Lafayette 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Reliable Equipment Leasing, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Midland Paper - Wheeling, IL 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lloyd Companies, Inc. 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hewes Marine Company 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE Life care center of elyria 175 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.