Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers · Texas

Dakota Hardwoods Austin #169

Austin, TX · ~31 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dakota Hardwoods Austin #169 runs at 283% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Dakota Hardwoods Austin #169: 6.2 TCR = 283% of Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dakota Hardwoods Austin #169 safety composite

Dakota Hardwoods Austin #169 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.1

2021→2024

Dakota Hardwoods Austin #169 injury rate improved

Dakota Hardwoods Austin #169's TCR fell 11.1 from 11.1 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 11.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=11.1 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423310 · Austin, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.2 · 283% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #114/149
  • PHOTO JSI Cabinetry, MA
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JSI Cabinetry, MA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Dakota Hardwoods Austin #169 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dakota Hardwoods Austin #169 averages 6.2 TCR (283% of the Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dakota Hardwoods Austin #169 TCR series: 2021=11.1 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Dakota Hardwoods Austin #169 falls in its industry

1,225 Lumber (e.g., dressed, finishe establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #114 safest of 149 Lumber (e.g., dressed, finishe employers in Texas.

Dakota Hardwoods Austin #169 (31 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100120 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Dakota Hardwoods Austin #169
Dakota Hardwoods Austin #169 (31 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Dakota Hardwoods Austin #169 has fewer employees than the Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.3 3.1 2 0 0
2022 7.5 7.5 2 0 0
2021 11.1 3.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423310 · TX · Austin

1,225 Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JSI Cabinetry, MA 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Franklin Building Supply - McCall 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1907 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Franklin Building Supply - Fruitland 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE TREES USA 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Treeland Nursery Inc 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE 145 Ranch LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Tulia 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Fannie E Taylor Home for the Age -Taylor Manor, INC 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Loma Linda 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Delaware 404 - Ernst Enterprises, Inc 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Seven Rivers Regional Medical Center - EVS 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Andis - Enterprise 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Verrette Materials, Inc / Gillett Cement Products 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE LIFE Lancaster 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Asheville Capital Projects 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.