Service establishment equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers · Minnesota

Dalco Enterprises, Inc. - Whole Company

New Brighton, MN · ~178 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dalco Enterprises, Inc. - Whole Company runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Service establishment equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Dalco Enterprises, Inc. - Whole Company: 3.1 TCR = 142% of Service establishment equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dalco Enterprises, Inc. - Whole Company safety composite

Dalco Enterprises, Inc. - Whole Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2020

Dalco Enterprises, Inc. - Whole Company injury rate improved

Dalco Enterprises, Inc. - Whole Company's TCR fell 0.4 from 3.2 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.2 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423850 · New Brighton, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.1 · 142% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #3/8
  • PHOTO MI012
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~178 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MI012 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Dalco Enterprises, Inc. - Whole Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dalco Enterprises, Inc. - Whole Company averages 3.1 TCR (142% of the Service establishment equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dalco Enterprises, Inc. - Whole Company TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=2.9 · BLS 2.2

Where Dalco Enterprises, Inc. - Whole Company falls in its industry

253 Service establishment equipmen establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 8 Service establishment equipmen employers in Minnesota.

Dalco Enterprises, Inc. - Whole Company (178 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Dalco Enterprises, Inc. - Whole Company
Dalco Enterprises, Inc. - Whole Company (178 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Dalco Enterprises, Inc. - Whole Company has more employees than the Service establishment equipment and supp median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.9 1.7 5 0 0
2019 3.8 0.9 7 1 0
2018 2.6 1.3 4 0 0
2016 3.2 2.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423850 · MN · New Brighton

253 Service establishment equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 80 employers in New Brighton, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MI012 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 717 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TX089 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brady Companies, LLC 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Horton, Inc 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE 00394-W001 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALEXANDRIA MN - 3183 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE District Office Employees 178 FTE
CITY-NEAR API Construction 396 FTE
CITY-NEAR GRUMA CORPORATION 339 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aqseptence Group, Inc.- Johnson Screens 250 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pentair Flow Technologies LLC New Brighton 229 FTE
NAT-TCR Tiffin Motor Homes, Inc 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Toccoa Ga 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Mills Market LLC 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Haigood & Campbell LLC 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Continental Structural Plastics of Louisiana 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milbank Manufacturing Concordia 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dayton Molded Urethanes LLC / Creative Foam Corporation 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE APS Keyser 178 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.