Stranded wire, uninsulated, made from purchased wire · Minnesota

Aqseptence Group, Inc.- Johnson Screens

New Brighton, MN · ~250 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aqseptence Group, Inc.- Johnson Screens runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Stranded wire, uninsulated, made from purchased wire workplace, earning a grade B.

Aqseptence Group, Inc.- Johnson Screens: 2.0 TCR = 62% of Stranded wire, uninsulated, made from purchased wire BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aqseptence Group, Inc.- Johnson Screens safety composite

Aqseptence Group, Inc.- Johnson Screens scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2022→2023

Aqseptence Group, Inc.- Johnson Screens injury rate improved

Aqseptence Group, Inc.- Johnson Screens's TCR fell 2.4 from 3.3 in 2022 to 0.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.3 · 2023=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332618 · New Brighton, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO AMACS Process Tower …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~250 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AMACS Process Tower Internals (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Aqseptence Group, Inc.- Johnson Screens in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aqseptence Group, Inc.- Johnson Screens averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Stranded wire, uninsulated, made from purchased wire BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aqseptence Group, Inc.- Johnson Screens TCR series: 2022=3.3 · 2023=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Aqseptence Group, Inc.- Johnson Screens falls in its industry

270 Stranded wire, uninsulated, ma establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Stranded wire, uninsulated, ma employers in Minnesota.

Aqseptence Group, Inc.- Johnson Screens (250 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Aqseptence Group, Inc.- Johnson Screens
Aqseptence Group, Inc.- Johnson Screens (250 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Aqseptence Group, Inc.- Johnson Screens has more employees than the Stranded wire, uninsulated, made from pu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.8 0.0 2 0 0
2022 3.3 3.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332618 · MN · New Brighton

270 Stranded wire, uninsulated, made from purchased wire employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 80 employers in New Brighton, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AMACS Process Tower Internals 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Material Handling Division 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meadow Burke - Fort Worth MFG 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR McEwen 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dan's Prize- Long Prairie, MN 250 FTE
STATE-SIZE US05 Mankato Links Snacks Inc. 250 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greatbatch Ltd. (dba Greatbatch Medical) 250 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2223 - Medina 250 FTE
CITY-NEAR API Construction 396 FTE
CITY-NEAR GRUMA CORPORATION 339 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pentair Flow Technologies LLC New Brighton 229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pentair 220 FTE
NAT-TCR Pro-Tops Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Double G Coatings Company L.P. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR PCC Airfoils LLC - Mentor Plant 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hadronics 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 033-FF01-MENASHA 250 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foodservice : FRANKFORT 250 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Campus 250 FTE
NAT-SIZE UCI, Inc. 250 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.