Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and paperboard, made from purchased paperboard · Texas

Dallas Container Corp.

Dallas, TX · ~71 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dallas Container Corp. runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and paperboard, made from purchased paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Dallas Container Corp.: 1.4 TCR = 41% of Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and paperboard, made from purchased paperboard BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dallas Container Corp. safety composite

Dallas Container Corp. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dallas Container Corp.: 0.0 → 2.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 2.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.97× in 2020

Dallas Container Corp.'s TCR rose 2.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Dallas, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 41% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #29/102
  • PHOTO HARRISONBURG VA
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HARRISONBURG VA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Dallas Container Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dallas Container Corp. averages 1.4 TCR (41% of the Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and paperboard, made from purchased paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dallas Container Corp. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Dallas Container Corp. falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, shipping, laminated pap establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 102 Boxes, shipping, laminated pap employers in Texas.

Dallas Container Corp. (71 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Dallas Container Corp.
Dallas Container Corp. (71 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Dallas Container Corp. has fewer employees than the Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and pap median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2019 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2018 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2017 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · TX · Dallas

1,338 Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and paperboard, made from purchased paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HARRISONBURG VA 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Green Bay Packaging El Paso Division 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR BCI Tennessee Division 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Antonio Central Container 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE West Gaines Seed Inc 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Innovex Downhole Solutions Andrews 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE SYSTEM OPERATIONS 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edinburg Location 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Sawyer Construction Co 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Mary`s Regional Medical Center 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR LaFollette Medical Center 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Jegs 11th Ave 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE AFTCO 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Linden Sawmill 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Brunswick at Longstown 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Highland Ind 06-161 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.