Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Texas

Green Bay Packaging El Paso Division

El Paso, TX · ~124 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Green Bay Packaging El Paso Division runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Green Bay Packaging El Paso Division: 1.4 TCR = 41% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Green Bay Packaging El Paso Division safety composite

Green Bay Packaging El Paso Division scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Green Bay Packaging El Paso Division: 1.2 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 1.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.3× in 2019

Green Bay Packaging El Paso Division's TCR rose 0.6 from 1.2 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · El Paso, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 41% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #30/102
  • PHOTO HARRISONBURG VA
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~124 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HARRISONBURG VA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Green Bay Packaging El Paso Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Green Bay Packaging El Paso Division averages 1.4 TCR (41% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Green Bay Packaging El Paso Division TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=0.6 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Green Bay Packaging El Paso Division falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 102 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Texas.

Green Bay Packaging El Paso Division (124 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Green Bay Packaging El Paso Division
Green Bay Packaging El Paso Division (124 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Green Bay Packaging El Paso Division has more employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.8 1.8 3 0 0
2018 1.8 1.8 3 0 0
2017 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 1.2 0.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · TX · El Paso

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 974 employers in El Paso, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HARRISONBURG VA 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dallas Container Corp. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR BCI Tennessee Division 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Antonio Central Container 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Citadel Drilling Ltd 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cisco Logistics 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Bellaire 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stoneridge Solar 124 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - El Paso 2,330 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alegre Home Health Care, LLC EL PASO 1,942 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - El Paso 1,847 FTE
CITY-NEAR MVT Services, LLC 1,798 FTE
NAT-TCR Kw International Inc Il 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lexington Pipe 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pettibone : Bartell 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Children'S Mercy Hospital 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE MedStar Medical Transportation 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Maryville 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE #715 Bakkery Commissary 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morristown (HR) 124 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.