Polyurethane foam products manufacturing · Texas

Dallas Fabrication Plant -19

Name: Dallas Fabrication Plant -19 Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Dallas, TX · ~86 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 8.2
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dallas Fabrication Plant -19 runs at 248% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Polyurethane foam products manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Dallas Fabrication Plant -19: 8.2 TCR = 248% of Polyurethane foam products manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dallas Fabrication Plant -19 safety composite

Dallas Fabrication Plant -19 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 8.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers
DART rate: D 2.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.2

2016→2019

Dallas Fabrication Plant -19 injury rate improved

Dallas Fabrication Plant -19's TCR fell 12.2 from 14.3 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.3 · 2019=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326150 · Dallas, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.2 · 248% of ind

DART 2.1 DART
RANK #36/38
PHOTO Future Foam Inc.
BOOK 2y book
INJ 13 inj
SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Future Foam Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Vibracoustic M

8.3
This site

8.2
Future Foam In

8.2
PURforms, Inc.

8.2
Francis

8.1

What this shows Dallas Fabrication Plant -19 averages 8.2 TCR (248% of the Polyurethane foam products manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Dallas Fabrication Plant -19 TCR series: 2016=14.3 · 2019=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Dallas Fabrication Plant -19 falls in its industry

474 Polyurethane foam products man establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 38 Polyurethane foam products man employers in Texas.

Dallas Fabrication Plant -19 (86 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Dallas Fabrication Plant -19 has more employees than the Polyurethane foam products manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2019	2.1	2.1	2	0	0
2016	14.3	8.3	11	1	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326150 · TX · Dallas

474 Polyurethane foam products manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Future Foam Inc.	FULLERTON, CA	8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	PURforms, Inc.	LOWELL, MI	8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Vibracoustic Manchester	MANCHESTER, NH	8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Francis	ONTARIO, CA	8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Village Farms, Permian Basin	MONAHANS	86 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Cal-Maine Food, Inc.- Klesel Complex	FLATONIA	86 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Sundown Tubing Testing	SUNDOWN	86 FTE
STATE-SIZE	San Antonio Division	SAN ANTONIO	86 FTE
CITY-NEAR	AECOM DCS (US Operations)	Dallas	15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Rexel USA, Inc	Dallas	8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR	1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS	Dallas	6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR	HDQ - Headquarters	Dallas	5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR	Thor Motor Coach/WH/CNC	Elkhart, IN	8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Brookdale Senior Living	Hoffman Estates, IL	8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	California Correctional Health Care Services (CCHCS) 042	Elk Grove, CA	8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	1038 St. Peters, MO	St. Peters, MO	8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	NGC - Mount Holly Plant	Mount Holly, NC	86 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Delta Power Company	Rockford, IL	86 FTE
NAT-SIZE	MUM Industries	Mentor, OH	86 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Van Buren/Cass District Health Department	Hartford, MI	86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.