Plant, potted flower and foliage, growing · Pennsylvania

Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Pipersville, PA)

Pipersville, PA · ~59 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Pipersville, PA) runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Plant, potted flower and foliage, growing workplace, earning a grade C.

Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Pipersville, PA): 3.7 TCR = 82% of Plant, potted flower and foliage, growing BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Pipersville, PA) safety composite

Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Pipersville, PA) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Pipersville, PA): 2.9 → 6.1 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 6.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.65× in 2022

Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Pipersville, PA)'s TCR rose 3.2 from 2.9 in 2016 to 6.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111422 · Pipersville, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 82% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #5/11
  • PHOTO Terra Nova Nurseries…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Terra Nova Nurseries, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Pipersville, PA) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Pipersville, PA) averages 3.7 TCR (82% of the Plant, potted flower and foliage, growing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Pipersville, PA) TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2017=5.9 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=6.3 · 2022=6.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Pipersville, PA) falls in its industry

166 Plant, potted flower and folia establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 11 Plant, potted flower and folia employers in Pennsylvania.

Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Pipersville, PA) (59 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Pipersville, PA)
Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Pipersville, PA) (59 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Pipersville, PA) has fewer employees than the Plant, potted flower and foliage, growin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.1 6.1 3 0 0
2021 6.3 3.1 3 1 0
2020 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2017 5.9 5.9 4 0 0
2016 2.9 1.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111422 · PA · Pipersville

166 Plant, potted flower and foliage, growing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 9 employers in Pipersville, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Terra Nova Nurseries, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR George Didden Greenhouse 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hazel Park 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nash Greenhouses, LLC 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Creek Nurseries, Inc. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eddystone Generating Station 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE S&A Homes, Inc. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Day Philadelphia 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Main Office 504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pennsylvania HQ & DC 291 FTE
CITY-NEAR WAWA SITE - 288 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR 288 49 FTE
NAT-TCR 0412 - Azusa Ca Whse 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 1189 - Woodlands Tx Whse 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 0341 - Commerce Township Mi Whse 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR WashingtonU DiningCommons 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4028-ARW14 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE 43811 - Dallas North Fac. 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lac Ste Clair Pool/Marina 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant 2 Ready Mix Facility 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.